How an Audio Interface Can Reduce Latency

How do you reduce audio latency? Understanding latency and the role audio interfaces play in minimizing it can dramatically improve your recording experience and creative workflow.
Understanding Audio Latency

Latency is the amount of time it takes for your audio or MIDI signal to be sent into your interface or computer, then have the signal sent through analog to digital converters into your DAW, back into your interface, then have it be converted back into analog to your outputs. This delay, measured in milliseconds, can make recording feel disconnected and unnatural.
Most people don't notice latencies below 10 ms or didn't find them disturbing. However, even small delays become noticeable when you're singing or playing an instrument and trying to stay in time with backing tracks. The accumulation of delays through each stage of processing creates the total roundtrip latency you experience.
Superior Audio Drivers
A better audio driver leads to better latency performance. The recommendation of your audio interface manufacturer usually yields the best results. Professional audio interfaces come with optimized drivers specifically designed to minimize latency while maintaining stability.
Windows computers often use an ASIO-based driver. Some manufacturers provide dedicated audio interface drivers for Windows that significantly improve your latency performance. Mac computers use the dedicated Core Audio system, which generally offers excellent performance across different interfaces.
Optimized Buffer Sizes

The buffer size controls how much audio data your computer processes at a time. Smaller buffer sizes reduce latency but increase CPU load, which may lead to audio glitches if your computer can't handle it. Finding the right balance proves essential for smooth recording.
If you have a modern computer, set your buffer size to the lowest value for the lowest latency, and make a recording. If you encounter dropouts or strange noises, increase the buffer size, and repeat the process. Common starting points include 128 or 256 samples, which typically provide good balance between low latency and system stability.
Direct Monitoring Features
Most audio interfaces come with a direct monitoring function that allows you to send your input signal straight to your headphone output before all the digital processing delays your signal. This feature provides the ultimate solution to latency by bypassing the computer entirely for input monitoring.
The upside of direct monitoring is close to zero latency. You hear your performance in real-time without any computer-induced delay. The downside is that you'll hear only the dry input signal without any effects or processing. Many interfaces let you blend direct monitoring with computer playback for optimal workflow.
High-Quality Hardware Components
Which DAW has the lowest latency? While DAW software affects latency, your audio interface hardware plays a more significant role. Modern USB and Thunderbolt interfaces are designed for low-latency performance, often promising results under 10 milliseconds.
The quality of the digital converters you use matters immensely. High-end interfaces from manufacturers like RME, Universal Audio, and Focusrite feature superior converters and processing that minimize latency while maximizing audio quality. Budget interfaces may struggle to achieve the same low-latency performance.
Connection Type Considerations
Before you nerd out on different connectors, ensure your audio interface comes with a solid audio driver. USB 2.0 has enough capacity for signal audio processing at low latencies for most users. Thunderbolt connections can lead to better latency performance, though this isn't solely due to higher speed.
The main advantage of Thunderbolt lies in how it communicates with your computer's processor. However, for most recording applications, a quality USB interface with good drivers will deliver excellent latency performance. Don't feel pressured to invest in Thunderbolt unless you need extreme channel counts or the absolute lowest possible latency.
CPU Power and System Optimization
Buffer size and CPU power are interconnected. Low buffer sizes lead to high CPU workload, while high buffer sizes result in less CPU workload. When recording, we want to hear what we're doing close to in real-time, which requires low buffers and consequently higher CPU usage.
The bigger the project gets, the higher the channel count grows, and the more plugins or virtual instruments you use, the more CPU power will be occupied. Closing unnecessary applications, disabling background processes, and ensuring your computer runs efficiently all contribute to better latency performance.
Sample Rate Considerations
Audio interface with ADAT can expand your channel count while maintaining low latency. Higher sample rates (88.2 kHz or 96 kHz) can reduce latency, though the difference may be subtle. However, higher sample rates also increase CPU load and file sizes, creating a trade-off you'll need to balance based on your needs.
For most recording applications, 44.1 kHz or 48 kHz provides excellent results with manageable system requirements. Unless you're working on projects specifically requiring higher sample rates for processing flexibility, standard rates deliver professional quality with optimal system performance.
Interface-Specific Latency Performance

Not all audio interfaces are created equal when it comes to latency. Using measurements with buffer sizes of 64 samples, interfaces like the RME Babyface Pro FS achieve round trip latency of about 3 milliseconds. This performance represents the gold standard, though many interfaces in lower price ranges still deliver latencies under 10 ms.
Research specific interface models before purchasing. Manufacturers often publish latency specifications, and independent reviews frequently include latency measurements. These real-world numbers help you understand what performance to expect from different interfaces at various price points.
Practical Latency Management Strategies
One of the easiest ways to improve latency is to adjust the buffer size and sample rate within your DAW. Start with buffer size around 128 samples for recording, then increase it to 512 or higher when mixing. This workflow optimization lets you enjoy low latency during tracking while preventing CPU overload during complex mixing.
Many DAWs allow you to change buffer size without restarting your project. Take advantage of this flexibility by using different settings for different tasks. Record with minimal latency, then increase buffer sizes for mixing and processing heavy sessions.
Audio Interface vs Built-In Audio
Compared to built-in outputs with latency around 21 milliseconds, professional audio interfaces can achieve latencies 5 times faster or better. Dedicated audio devices with highly-optimized software drivers outperform mass-market computer audio hardware designed for general use rather than professional audio applications.
A proper audio interface undoubtedly reduces latency. Mass-market computing devices will never have high-performance audio hardware, as it simply doesn't make sense economically for manufacturers. Professional interfaces justify their cost through superior components and driver optimization.
Setting Up for Optimal Latency
Start by downloading and installing the most up-to-date drivers for your interface. Using the wrong driver or outdated drivers can cause ridiculous amounts of delay even with high-quality interfaces. Make sure to select the ASIO driver for your interface in your audio hardware settings within your DAW.
Update your operating system and drivers regularly to ensure better performance and compatibility with audio software. Disable background processes, close unnecessary applications, and set your PC to high-performance mode. These optimizations reduce processing overhead that can interfere with low-latency audio performance.
When Latency Matters Most
Latency is most important during time-critical tasks, such as monitoring an input signal live, especially during musical performances. When you're simply mixing or arranging pre-recorded material, latency becomes less critical since you're not performing in real-time.
Understanding when latency truly matters helps you make intelligent decisions about buffer sizes and system settings. Switch to low-latency settings for recording and live monitoring, then increase buffer sizes for mixing to free up CPU resources for processing and effects.
The Real-World Impact
For rough math, sound travels at around 1 foot per millisecond. The delay you experience playing through a system with 10 milliseconds of latency is similar to standing 10 feet away from your amplifier on stage. This perspective helps contextualize latency numbers and understand what's actually acceptable for different applications.
Modern audio interfaces have made latency a solved problem for most users. With proper setup and reasonable system hardware, you can achieve monitoring latency that feels instantaneous, letting you focus on performance rather than fighting technical limitations.
Related Articles:
- The Essential Role of an Audio Interface in Home Recording
-
Guide to ALL RME Audio Interfaces 2026
- Still Unsure of whats right for your setup? Check out our Studio Audit
- Resolve Crackling Audio Interface Issues Quickly
- The Best Audio Interfaces for Music Production
Experience zero-latency recording: Explore our audio interface collection featuring the latest low-latency technology.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does an audio interface reduce latency? An audio interface reduces latency by replacing a computer's generic built-in audio hardware with dedicated analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog converters paired with optimized low-latency drivers. Built-in computer audio typically produces round-trip latency of around 21 milliseconds. Professional audio interfaces using ASIO drivers on Windows or Core Audio on macOS can reduce this to 3 to 6 milliseconds at a 128-sample buffer size, which is below the threshold most musicians notice during recording.
What buffer size should I use for recording? A buffer size of 64 to 128 samples is recommended for recording when low latency monitoring is required. At 128 samples, most modern computers achieve round-trip latency between 3 and 6 milliseconds, which feels close to instantaneous during live performance. If audio dropouts or glitches occur at 128 samples, increase to 256 samples. When mixing rather than recording, set the buffer size to 512 or 1024 samples to free CPU resources for plugins and virtual instruments without latency being a concern.
What is the difference between ASIO and Core Audio for latency? ASIO (Audio Stream Input/Output) is the low-latency driver standard used on Windows computers for professional audio. Core Audio is the equivalent system built into macOS. Both provide significantly lower latency than standard Windows audio drivers (WDM or WASAPI) or general macOS audio. ASIO drivers are provided by the audio interface manufacturer and communicate directly with the hardware, bypassing Windows audio processing layers that add delay. Core Audio is built into macOS and offers consistent low-latency performance across compatible interfaces.
Does Thunderbolt give lower latency than USB for audio recording? Thunderbolt audio interfaces achieve lower round-trip latency than USB in most professional applications. The RME Babyface Pro FS achieves approximately 3 milliseconds round-trip latency at a 64-sample buffer size over USB. Thunderbolt interfaces such as the Universal Audio Apollo Twin X achieve approximately 2 milliseconds RTL at equivalent settings. For most home studio recording, the difference is imperceptible. Thunderbolt becomes the clear choice when recording 32 or more simultaneous channels or requiring absolute minimum latency for live performance monitoring.
What is direct monitoring and does it eliminate latency? Direct monitoring routes the input signal from the audio interface directly to the headphone output before the signal enters the computer for processing. This bypasses all digital processing delays and produces effectively zero latency monitoring. The trade-off is that direct monitoring plays back the dry, unprocessed signal without DAW effects or plugins. Most professional interfaces including the RME Babyface Pro FS, Universal Audio Apollo interfaces, and Antelope Audio Zen series include direct monitoring with hardware DSP processing to allow effects to be applied at near-zero latency.
How much latency is acceptable for recording vocals and instruments? Round-trip latency below 10 milliseconds is generally considered acceptable for recording vocals and instruments with headphone monitoring. Latency below 5 milliseconds is essentially imperceptible for most musicians. As a reference point, sound travels approximately one foot per millisecond, so 10 milliseconds of latency is acoustically equivalent to standing 10 feet from a monitor speaker. The RME Babyface Pro FS achieves approximately 3 milliseconds RTL at 64 samples, which represents the high-performance benchmark for USB audio interfaces.
Why does my audio interface still have high latency even with ASIO drivers? High latency despite using ASIO drivers is typically caused by one of four issues: the buffer size is set too high in the DAW settings, the ASIO driver selected in the DAW is not the manufacturer's dedicated driver, background processes on the computer are creating DPC (Deferred Procedure Call) latency spikes, or the interface firmware is outdated. On Windows 11 (24H2), setting the power plan to High Performance and disabling USB selective suspend resolves most reported DPC latency issues that affect audio interface performance.